Experts for pandemic prevention group
The UN health agency has launched a long-term initiative to support studies into the origins of any and all future emerging pathogens.
Geneva - The World Health Organisation has called for experts to advise on the scientific steps needed when facing new dangerous pathogens with the potential to spark pandemics like Covid-19
The UN health agency launched a call for nominations of experts across a wide range of fields, including virology, veterinary medicine and laboratory safety and security, to join its new permanent International Scientific Advisory Group for Origins of Novel Pathogens, or SAGO.
WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced the creation of the group last month, stressing that it would "play a vital role" in the next phase of investigations into how the SARS CoV-2 virus behind Covid-19 first jumped into humans.
But he stressed in a closed-door briefing with member states last week that the new group was about much more than the current pandemic.
"It is a long-term initiative to support studies into the origins of any and all future emerging pathogens," he said, pointing out that the virus behind the Covid pandemic was only the latest high-threat pathogen to emerge, following the likes of SARS, MERS, Ebola and Marburg.
GLOBAL SEARCH
WHO's technical lead on Covid-19 Maria Van Kerkhove stressed to AFP that the new advisory group would not be responsible for organising possible future missions to China or elsewhere in the hunt for the pandemic origins.
She said the experts would be asked to provide "an independent evaluation of where we are on the scientific findings, the technical findings of all available data, all available studies into the global search for SARS CoV-2".
And they would be asked to advise the WHO on how to move forward with the second phase of the origins probe, with more studies needed "not only in China but also in other countries".
Van Kerkove stressed though that SAGO's role was "long term", helping to streamline the process for dealing with dangerous new pathogens, many of which may already be waiting in the wings.
"We believe that the next Disease X is out there."
ORIGINS
The first phase of the Covid origins probe saw a team of international experts go to Wuhan earlier this year and produce a report with their Chinese counterparts that drew no firm conclusions.
Instead it ranked four hypotheses, deeming a jump from bats to human via an intermediate animal was the most probable scenario, while a lab leak was seen as "extremely unlikely".
But the investigation faced criticism for lacking transparency and access, and for not evaluating the lab-leak theory more thoroughly.
A WHO call last month for the investigation's second stage to include audits of the Wuhan labs infuriated Beijing, which has also rejected as political the agency's call for raw data from the earliest Covid cases.
Pressure has again been mounting on Beijing to consider a fresh probe into the origins of a pandemic which has killed more than four million people and paralysed economies worldwide since it first emerged in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in late 2019.
"I'm confident ... that our colleagues in China are very much willing to cooperate on the scientific studies that are needed to further explore the origins," WHO emergencies director Mike Ryan told reporters.
POLITICS
The WHO, and Ryan in particular, has repeatedly appealed for a depoliticisation of the origins investigation - seen as vital to helping prevent future pandemics.
"I think what's happened in all of this is that the politics have really contaminated the environment and changed the atmosphere," he said. "We're working very hard behind the scenes to increase the level of confidence and to get people to recommit to the scientific process."
"I believe we're making headway in that," Ryan said, acknowledging though that the task was "not that easy given some of the rhetoric that we've all experienced over the last number of weeks and months."
The rhetoric and finger-pointing contributed to delaying the first phase of the investigation, with the WHO only able to send a team of international experts to Wuhan in January 2021, more than a year after the pandemic erupted. – Nampa/AFP
The UN health agency launched a call for nominations of experts across a wide range of fields, including virology, veterinary medicine and laboratory safety and security, to join its new permanent International Scientific Advisory Group for Origins of Novel Pathogens, or SAGO.
WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced the creation of the group last month, stressing that it would "play a vital role" in the next phase of investigations into how the SARS CoV-2 virus behind Covid-19 first jumped into humans.
But he stressed in a closed-door briefing with member states last week that the new group was about much more than the current pandemic.
"It is a long-term initiative to support studies into the origins of any and all future emerging pathogens," he said, pointing out that the virus behind the Covid pandemic was only the latest high-threat pathogen to emerge, following the likes of SARS, MERS, Ebola and Marburg.
GLOBAL SEARCH
WHO's technical lead on Covid-19 Maria Van Kerkhove stressed to AFP that the new advisory group would not be responsible for organising possible future missions to China or elsewhere in the hunt for the pandemic origins.
She said the experts would be asked to provide "an independent evaluation of where we are on the scientific findings, the technical findings of all available data, all available studies into the global search for SARS CoV-2".
And they would be asked to advise the WHO on how to move forward with the second phase of the origins probe, with more studies needed "not only in China but also in other countries".
Van Kerkove stressed though that SAGO's role was "long term", helping to streamline the process for dealing with dangerous new pathogens, many of which may already be waiting in the wings.
"We believe that the next Disease X is out there."
ORIGINS
The first phase of the Covid origins probe saw a team of international experts go to Wuhan earlier this year and produce a report with their Chinese counterparts that drew no firm conclusions.
Instead it ranked four hypotheses, deeming a jump from bats to human via an intermediate animal was the most probable scenario, while a lab leak was seen as "extremely unlikely".
But the investigation faced criticism for lacking transparency and access, and for not evaluating the lab-leak theory more thoroughly.
A WHO call last month for the investigation's second stage to include audits of the Wuhan labs infuriated Beijing, which has also rejected as political the agency's call for raw data from the earliest Covid cases.
Pressure has again been mounting on Beijing to consider a fresh probe into the origins of a pandemic which has killed more than four million people and paralysed economies worldwide since it first emerged in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in late 2019.
"I'm confident ... that our colleagues in China are very much willing to cooperate on the scientific studies that are needed to further explore the origins," WHO emergencies director Mike Ryan told reporters.
POLITICS
The WHO, and Ryan in particular, has repeatedly appealed for a depoliticisation of the origins investigation - seen as vital to helping prevent future pandemics.
"I think what's happened in all of this is that the politics have really contaminated the environment and changed the atmosphere," he said. "We're working very hard behind the scenes to increase the level of confidence and to get people to recommit to the scientific process."
"I believe we're making headway in that," Ryan said, acknowledging though that the task was "not that easy given some of the rhetoric that we've all experienced over the last number of weeks and months."
The rhetoric and finger-pointing contributed to delaying the first phase of the investigation, with the WHO only able to send a team of international experts to Wuhan in January 2021, more than a year after the pandemic erupted. – Nampa/AFP
Comments
Namibian Sun
No comments have been left on this article