EDITORIAL: Activism of insults abhorrent

Pockets of anti-establishment demonstrations have soared in recent weeks as Namibians continue to demand better treatment from their leaders across the spectrum.

While the demonstrations fall well within the ambits of freedom of expression, as protected by the country’s constitution, many have turned violent either in action or by word of mouth.

Despite its foundational importance, freedom of speech was never intended to be absolute. The exercising of this freedom carries with it duties, responsibilities and restrictions.

Insults - such as calling others ‘dogs’ - are not protected by freedom of speech. They can be construed as hate crimes and harassment and a myriad of other offenses.

True, the definition of ‘insult’ is a tad subjective. But some insults are so blatant one doesn’t need a brain surgeon to understand them.

Indeed, there is a lot of legitimacy to why many Namibians are angry. Youth unemployment is skyrocketing and so is public debt, while the economy has been on autopilot for consecutive quarters.

Learners sit on the floor during lessons, while others sit under trees and face the wrath of snakes and other elements that perhaps feel their space is being encroached upon.

But there is a legitimate way within which such anger must be expressed. The excuse that people are so angry they cannot contain their emotions is a cheap shot no one should duck from.