Judiciary ‘welcome constructive criticism’

"Like any other branch of the state, the judiciary is not immune to criticism. It does indeed welcome constructive criticism. However, it should be made clear that unsupported attacks on the judiciary undermine its independence and erode public trust in the administration of justice. Criticism of the judiciary should be informed and thoroughly investigated before being aired and should not attribute inappropriate or personal motives to judiciary officials," said Viktoria Hango, a spokesperson for the justice ministry, in response to questions about public criticism of the judiciary.

Report to the appropriate authorities

Hango said members of the public are welcome to voice their dissatisfaction with the judiciary in constructive ways. "Any party dissatisfied with the conduct of legal officials or the outcome of their trial in the High Court may approach the Supreme Court for an appeal or a review of the facts," she said.

If a member of the public who was not a party to a trial is dissatisfied with the conduct of a legal official, they have a responsibility to bring it to the attention of the Namibian police or the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC), she added.

Hango explained that the Judicial Service Commission can also be approached to investigate allegations of misconduct by judges.

However, she underlined the importance of proof.

"Without evidence, it is impossible for the relevant branches of the state to take action," she underlined.

Regarding allegations that legal officials who cannot issue proper court orders are doing so to favour commercial banks, Hango said: "The registrar and assistant registrars [of the High Court] do not adjudicate cases in the High or Supreme Court. They do not render judgements – regardless of the nature of the case."

She clarified that the registrar, as well as deputy registrars and assistant registrars, sign court orders as soon as they are in writing.