The discipline of opinion writing
Shonena V. NathanaelThe Indian-British novelist Salman Rushdie, one of my favourite writers, turned much of the Middle East against him by writing a book critical of Islamic extremism. The Satanic Verses was not just a novel - it was a provocation. Whether one agrees with it or not is beside the point. What matters is what Rushdie revealed about the role of the writer in society.
In that book, he describes the poet’s task as one “to name the unnamable, to point at frauds, to take sides, start arguments, shape the world and stop it from going to sleep.” It is a striking definition, recognising the non-neutral, interventionist role of writing.
Yet writers should also be defined by what comes after that act of naming. A writer should claim the world, carry it on their shoulders, and still be able to sleep peacefully at night, knowing that their activism - disguised in words - was thoughtful, deliberate, and necessary to steer the world in a better direction.
This understanding of responsibility is not unique to Rushdie. The Palestinian-American intellectual Edward Said argued in Representations of the Intellectual that the writer’s role is to “speak truth to power.” A writer accepts the problems of the past and present while striving to shape a better future.
A South African facilitator, Bandile Sizani, once remarked that the significance of a speaker should be evident from their first sentence. Words, in other words, are never innocent. They introduce us, frame us, and signal to the listener what kind of intellectual and moral encounter they are about to enter. For this reason, words should be carefully considered. One must decide what kind of “coat” the world should wear after reading them. The same principle applies to writing, particularly opinion writing.
Opinion articles, commonly referred to as op-eds, occupy a unique and powerful space. They are not academic papers, yet they influence public understanding. They are not news reports, yet they shape how news is interpreted. Because of this position, op-eds should not merely express opinion—they should carry weight. And weight does not come from emotion alone.
An opinion that is not supported by engagement with facts, studies, history, or credible public information risks becoming a performance rather than an argument. Emotion may draw attention, but it is research that earns trust.
This is a trap I have fallen into myself, and it is one I see many emerging Namibian opinion writers fall into as well. Our newspapers are increasingly filled with strong feelings of anger, frustration, and disappointment - feelings that are not accompanied by the intellectual labour required to persuade readers who do not already agree.
That does not mean emotion should be excluded. Writing without feeling is lifeless, and emotion must be disciplined by research. It forces the writer to slow down, verify, and question their own assumptions before demanding agreement from others.
Opinion writing becomes valuable when it shows that the writer has done more than react - that they have thought. Aristotle understood this in Rhetoric with his artistic proofs (ethos, pathos, and logos), and Pew Research Center has substantiated it, finding that audiences are more likely to trust opinion writing when arguments are supported by verifiable facts and data.
An example can be seen when Junias David, a thought leader, carelessly wrote in one of his articles that “statistics indicate that single-parent households, more so those led by women, contribute significantly to food insecurity,” without specifying the statistics or explaining the reasoning. He recklessly painted all mothers in a negative light and ultimately failed to meet the standard of careful, evidence-based commentary that George Orwell champions in Why I Write.
This is especially important in a society like ours, where public discourse plays a role in shaping democracy itself. In the end, opinion writing is not about winning arguments. It is about contributing to public understanding. It is about recognising that words, once published, do not belong to the writer - they belong to the society that must live with them.
Rushdie understood this risk. So did Orwell. So do many writers who write knowing that words can unsettle, provoke, and disturb. But disturbance without discipline is irresponsible.
If opinion writing is to mean anything, it is to inform, challenge, and shape - not merely vent. Research must therefore be treated not as an optional extra but as an ethical obligation.
*Shonena V. Nathanael is an English and Linguistics student, activist, and a Program for Young Politicians in Africa (PYPA) graduate.
In that book, he describes the poet’s task as one “to name the unnamable, to point at frauds, to take sides, start arguments, shape the world and stop it from going to sleep.” It is a striking definition, recognising the non-neutral, interventionist role of writing.
Yet writers should also be defined by what comes after that act of naming. A writer should claim the world, carry it on their shoulders, and still be able to sleep peacefully at night, knowing that their activism - disguised in words - was thoughtful, deliberate, and necessary to steer the world in a better direction.
This understanding of responsibility is not unique to Rushdie. The Palestinian-American intellectual Edward Said argued in Representations of the Intellectual that the writer’s role is to “speak truth to power.” A writer accepts the problems of the past and present while striving to shape a better future.
A South African facilitator, Bandile Sizani, once remarked that the significance of a speaker should be evident from their first sentence. Words, in other words, are never innocent. They introduce us, frame us, and signal to the listener what kind of intellectual and moral encounter they are about to enter. For this reason, words should be carefully considered. One must decide what kind of “coat” the world should wear after reading them. The same principle applies to writing, particularly opinion writing.
Opinion articles, commonly referred to as op-eds, occupy a unique and powerful space. They are not academic papers, yet they influence public understanding. They are not news reports, yet they shape how news is interpreted. Because of this position, op-eds should not merely express opinion—they should carry weight. And weight does not come from emotion alone.
An opinion that is not supported by engagement with facts, studies, history, or credible public information risks becoming a performance rather than an argument. Emotion may draw attention, but it is research that earns trust.
This is a trap I have fallen into myself, and it is one I see many emerging Namibian opinion writers fall into as well. Our newspapers are increasingly filled with strong feelings of anger, frustration, and disappointment - feelings that are not accompanied by the intellectual labour required to persuade readers who do not already agree.
That does not mean emotion should be excluded. Writing without feeling is lifeless, and emotion must be disciplined by research. It forces the writer to slow down, verify, and question their own assumptions before demanding agreement from others.
Opinion writing becomes valuable when it shows that the writer has done more than react - that they have thought. Aristotle understood this in Rhetoric with his artistic proofs (ethos, pathos, and logos), and Pew Research Center has substantiated it, finding that audiences are more likely to trust opinion writing when arguments are supported by verifiable facts and data.
An example can be seen when Junias David, a thought leader, carelessly wrote in one of his articles that “statistics indicate that single-parent households, more so those led by women, contribute significantly to food insecurity,” without specifying the statistics or explaining the reasoning. He recklessly painted all mothers in a negative light and ultimately failed to meet the standard of careful, evidence-based commentary that George Orwell champions in Why I Write.
This is especially important in a society like ours, where public discourse plays a role in shaping democracy itself. In the end, opinion writing is not about winning arguments. It is about contributing to public understanding. It is about recognising that words, once published, do not belong to the writer - they belong to the society that must live with them.
Rushdie understood this risk. So did Orwell. So do many writers who write knowing that words can unsettle, provoke, and disturb. But disturbance without discipline is irresponsible.
If opinion writing is to mean anything, it is to inform, challenge, and shape - not merely vent. Research must therefore be treated not as an optional extra but as an ethical obligation.
*Shonena V. Nathanael is an English and Linguistics student, activist, and a Program for Young Politicians in Africa (PYPA) graduate.
Comments
Namibian Sun
No comments have been left on this article