Rebels with a cause?
When throngs of women from around the nation converge on Washington for a march on the day after Donald Trump's inauguration, they will arrive driven by a multitude of motivations.
Gay rights, gun control, immigrant rights, equal pay, reproductive freedom, racial justice, worker rights, climate change, support for vaccinations: They all make the list of progressive causes that are attracting people to the Women's March on Washington and its sister marches across the country and the world this coming Saturday.
“We are not going to give the next president that much focus,” says Linda Sarsour, a national march organiser and executive director of the Arab American Association of New York. “What we want from him is to see us in focus.” But while Trump's name may not literally appear in the march's “mission and vision” statement, the common denominator uniting the marchers appears to be a loathing for the president-elect and dismay that so much of the country voted for him.
“This march feels like a chance to be part of something that isn't pity, isn't powerlessness,” says Leslie Rutkowski, an American living in Norway who plans to fly back for the march. “I hope it is unifying. I hope it flies in the face of Trump's platform of hate and divisiveness.”
Adds Kelsey Wadman, a new mom in California who's helping to organise a parallel march in San Diego: “It's not just about Donald Trump the person. It's about what he evoked out of the country.” The march in Washington is set to start near the Capitol and then move toward the White House. It probably will be the largest of a number of inauguration-related protests.
Christopher Geldart, the District of Columbia's homeland security director, said he expected the march to draw more than the 200 000 people organisers are planning for, based on bus registrations and train bookings.
The focus of the march has been a work in progress since the idea of a Washington mobilisation first bubbled up from a number of women's social media posts in the hours after Trump's election. The group's November application for a march permit summed up its purpose as to “come together in solidarity to express to the new administration and Congress that women's rights are human rights and our power cannot be ignored.” That phrasing rankled some who thought it was tied too closely to Hillary Clinton, the defeated Democratic nominee, whose famous Beijing speech as first lady declared that “women's rights are human rights.” The fact that the initial march organisers were mostly white women also generated grumbling, this time from minorities. Gradually, the march's leadership and its mission statements have become more all-inclusive. America Ferrera, leading the celebrity contingent for the march, rolled out a long list of concerns in a statement announcing her role. “Immigrant rights, worker rights, reproductive rights, LGBTQIA rights, racial justice and environmental rights are not special interests, they affect us all and should be every American's concerns,” she wrote.
Other prominent names involved with the march have put a spotlight on one concern - or another.
Actress Scarlett Johansson, who plans to participate, put her focus on the incoming administration's intentions of “reducing the availability of women's health care and attacking her reproductive rights.” Actress Debra Messing, listed as a supporter of the march, wrote of the need to protect Planned Parenthood.
NAMPA/AP
Gay rights, gun control, immigrant rights, equal pay, reproductive freedom, racial justice, worker rights, climate change, support for vaccinations: They all make the list of progressive causes that are attracting people to the Women's March on Washington and its sister marches across the country and the world this coming Saturday.
“We are not going to give the next president that much focus,” says Linda Sarsour, a national march organiser and executive director of the Arab American Association of New York. “What we want from him is to see us in focus.” But while Trump's name may not literally appear in the march's “mission and vision” statement, the common denominator uniting the marchers appears to be a loathing for the president-elect and dismay that so much of the country voted for him.
“This march feels like a chance to be part of something that isn't pity, isn't powerlessness,” says Leslie Rutkowski, an American living in Norway who plans to fly back for the march. “I hope it is unifying. I hope it flies in the face of Trump's platform of hate and divisiveness.”
Adds Kelsey Wadman, a new mom in California who's helping to organise a parallel march in San Diego: “It's not just about Donald Trump the person. It's about what he evoked out of the country.” The march in Washington is set to start near the Capitol and then move toward the White House. It probably will be the largest of a number of inauguration-related protests.
Christopher Geldart, the District of Columbia's homeland security director, said he expected the march to draw more than the 200 000 people organisers are planning for, based on bus registrations and train bookings.
The focus of the march has been a work in progress since the idea of a Washington mobilisation first bubbled up from a number of women's social media posts in the hours after Trump's election. The group's November application for a march permit summed up its purpose as to “come together in solidarity to express to the new administration and Congress that women's rights are human rights and our power cannot be ignored.” That phrasing rankled some who thought it was tied too closely to Hillary Clinton, the defeated Democratic nominee, whose famous Beijing speech as first lady declared that “women's rights are human rights.” The fact that the initial march organisers were mostly white women also generated grumbling, this time from minorities. Gradually, the march's leadership and its mission statements have become more all-inclusive. America Ferrera, leading the celebrity contingent for the march, rolled out a long list of concerns in a statement announcing her role. “Immigrant rights, worker rights, reproductive rights, LGBTQIA rights, racial justice and environmental rights are not special interests, they affect us all and should be every American's concerns,” she wrote.
Other prominent names involved with the march have put a spotlight on one concern - or another.
Actress Scarlett Johansson, who plans to participate, put her focus on the incoming administration's intentions of “reducing the availability of women's health care and attacking her reproductive rights.” Actress Debra Messing, listed as a supporter of the march, wrote of the need to protect Planned Parenthood.
NAMPA/AP
Comments
Namibian Sun
No comments have been left on this article